BRAIN RESEARCH, HUMAN MEMORY BOOKS, MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, LAPTOP, NOTEBOOK, COMPUTER, and ELECTRONICS

Search
 PC Hardware

Motherboards

Solid State Drives

Hard Disk Drives

Home

PC Hardware

Solid State Drives

Intel X25-M Mainstream 160GB SATA 2.5-Inch MLC Solid State Drive

Intel X25-M Mainstream 160GB SATA 2.5-Inch MLC Solid State Drive

Email a friendEmailView larger imageZoom

Intel X25-M Mainstream 160GB SATA 2.5-Inch MLC Solid State Drive

 
 
 
SKU:  

0735858204941

Availability:   Out of stock
 
 
Out of stock


Features
  • 160 GB Solid State Drive provides outstanding performance and durability in a 2.5" form factor

  • No moving parts for faster performance and higher durability

  • Sustained sequential write speeds of up to 250 MBps and read speeds of up to 70 MBps

  • SATA interface provides up to 3GBps data throughput

  • Backed by a three-year warranty


Description

160GB SSD 2.5 SATA INT MLC X25-M 9.5MM


Product Details
Product Weight:0.25 pounds
Package Length:6.7 inches
Package Width:5.3 inches
Package Height:1.2 inches
Package Weight:0.25 pounds
Average Customer Rating: based on 11 reviews

Customer Reviews
Average Customer Review:4.5 ( 11 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

10 of 10 found the following review helpful:


5Best SSD for MAC  Jun 05, 2009 By D. Valdez
I upgraded an intel 2.4ghz IMAC which had a Hitachi 7200RPM drive in it. The speed of this drive over a regular hard drive is night and day. I ran xbench 1.3 with my original drive and got a score of 64 which is average for these type of drives. With the new Intel drive I now get a score of 255. The boot time with this drive is less then 10 sec. and makes the machine blazingly fast. It takes me longer to get through the BIOS load during the boot process then it actually takes to get to the desktop.

I like the firmware upgrade of this drive over the OCZ Vertex. For MAC users this can be very import. For the intel drive you burn an ISO to a CD then boot your MAC/PC off the CD and update your drive. The update also does not delete the data you already have on the drive saving you a rebuild. For the OCZ you have to remove the drive and install a pin so you can update the drive. You then have to boot into a Windows OS to run the firmware upgrade. The firmware upgrade for the OCZ DOES delete the drive causing you to have to rebuild it.

Make sure if you do get one of these Intel drives it is running at least firmware 8820. This firmware addresses some fragmentation issues causing the drive to lose performance over time.

6 of 6 found the following review helpful:


5IBM Lenovo T500 with Ubuntu Linux -- No Problems & Fast -- Note Optimizations at the end of review.  Jul 07, 2009 By Robert "Linux User, Attorney, Hacker"
This drive is very fast. (Note, the linux optimizations I have included at the end of the review.) However, one might get confused when reviewing the technical specifications of this drive and comparing them to the specifications of the rebranded samsung drives that now come in capacities as high as 250 GB. I really would prefer the larger size, but after a lot of research I discovered that the benchmark data for the rebranded (non-Intel) drives are done using hypothetical non-real world scenarios. From what I have learned the Intel X25-M can handle multiple read/writes much more efficiently then the other SSD drives. With most usage scenarios a modern operating system will have multiple files open. Finally, with respect to price/performance I believe this drive is a reasonable purchase if: (1) you want a fast laptop, (2) you want more storage then the 80 Gig model which is about 40% of the cost of this drive, and (3) power consumption is an issue (for example you need to travel alot and you hate running out of power). Considering 8 GB of DDR3 memory for a T500 is about the same price, I consider the cost consistent with other premium laptop components. Optimizations for linux: (a) replace relatime with noatime in fstab; (b) add the following to fstab tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0 (uses memory as a buffer for tmp); and (c) elevator=deadline as a kernel boot parameter.



3 of 3 found the following review helpful:


5Great drive, but get the current firmware  Jun 09, 2009 By Pipper
This drive is blazing fast, and I love it except for one problem: any firmware older than 8820 has a fragmentation issue that causes serious performance degradation. Intel fixed this issue with the 8820 firmware version. My problem is that it's been impossible for me to upgrade the firmware because the necessary BIOS changes are locked out on my brand new HP laptop. I've tried to upgrade the firmware by installing the drive in 3 other computers and boot from the image update CD, but the update software will not recognize the drive in any of them even though the drive subsequently mounts on the desktop. I'm returning this for another with the current firmware.

All in all, though, this is a great product: programs that took 30 seconds to load seem to open instantaneously. It runs silent and cool. Just check the firmware version in the upper right corner of the drive's label. Depending on your system, you might have difficulty performing an update. Also, don't format these drives: formatting writes a pattern to every sector and will degrade performance.

2 of 2 found the following review helpful:


5My computer is cleared for takeoff...  Feb 22, 2009 By R. Jager "R. Jager"
Wow. This product has singlehandedly rejuvenated my computer! I have a relatively old thinkpad t61 and I don't think it has ever been faster. Everything just POPS. Want to open a Word document --> blink. done. Open an AVI file. Doubleclick and... Bam.

The hard drive's screaming performance is just incredible. In fact, I first thought that my computer could never be so fast, but... you really have to try it to believe it.

The only con is the price. The 160gb version is very expensive... but in the end, for me, at least, it has been well worth it. (FYI I'm sure prices will come down in the future...)

Good luck!

1 of 1 found the following review helpful:


2Failed, just over > 1 yr. later  Oct 13, 2010 By iomatic
While it lasted, it was quick and instantaneously responsive, so I can't give it a single star.

Now, it's dead, though, and that means I can't get any data off of it (yes I do run backups). Tech Tool Pro, Disk Utility-- nothing can report it now; it's clinically dead. Alas, I cannot recommend this product, and you will find more backup if you search for this failure.

See all 11 customer reviews on Amazon.com
 About UsContact Us
Web business powered by Amazon WebStore